View source for Talk:Peppermint parasol

==Per day?==
I'm getting the impression that the counter might be reset on rollover, thinking I've used my parasol once before and still needing three uses to get the three uses message. Does anyone have more data to confirm or reject this? --[[User:Notsupposedtobehere|Notsupposedtobehere]] 00:52, 16 December 2011 (CET)
* The parasol works the same way as the GAP and Naval Ring. So the runaway counter DOES reset on rollover, however, the parasol WILL break after certain amounts of use. The break counter, much like Sugar items, does not reset on rollover. --[[User:Erich|Erich]] 21:49, 16 December 2011 (CET)
**So the messages start over on a new day like you have a new parasol, but breakage happens (with the full breaking message) once you've used it a total of 14 times. Is that right? That seems like it might fit with what I've seen. --[[User:Notsupposedtobehere|Notsupposedtobehere]] 22:29, 16 December 2011 (CET)
***Pretty much. If you use it only 3 times a day, you'll always get a free runaway, but it'll break after however many uses total (14? I haven't a clue). Also, it shares a counter with the GAP/Naval Ring, but I think that was already mentioned.--[[User:Erich|Erich]] 22:38, 16 December 2011 (CET)
==Breakage==
Has it been spaded whether the breakage counter resets on ascension? --[[User:Ailurodragon|Ailuro Dragon]] 18:17, 28 December 2011 (CET)

==Untinkering==
Oddly enough, this and the candycane candygram aren't showing up in untinker dropdown. intentional, or bug? [[User:Argus|Argus]] 22:52, 22 January 2012 (CET)
* Intentional. I think it was to make it so pulling a candygram wasn't the same as pulling 2 crooks.--[[User:Erich|Erich]] 23:16, 22 January 2012 (CET)
* It's already listed on [[The Untinker's Cottage]] as one of the exceptions to the rule.--[[User:Toffile|Toffile]] 01:07, 23 January 2012 (CET)
**Was it untinkerable very briefly after being released? [[User:Notsupposedtobehere|Notsupposedtobehere]] 10:12, 24 January 2012 (CET)
***if the forums are to be believed, yes. --[[User:Evilkolbot|Evilkolbot]] 13:48, 24 January 2012 (CET)