Talk:Annual Ascot: Difference between revisions

From A KoL Wiki
imported>Johnny Treehugger
m Well, this was a lousy day to start testing this.
imported>Johnny Treehugger
m Ding I am done
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
| {{moon|2|5|2}}
| {{moon|2|5|2}}
| 4
| 4
| 0
| 1
| +12%
| +12%
| +0%
| +5%
|-
| January 29, 2010
| {{moon|3|6|4}}
| 5
| 2
| +12%
| +10%
|-
| January 30, 2010
| {{moon|4|6|6}}
| 5
| 2
| +12%
| +10%
|-
| January 31, 2010
| {{moon|5|7|8}}
| 6
| 2
| +12%
| +10%
|-
| February 1, 2010
| {{moon|6|7|10}}
| 6
| 2
| +12%
| +10%
|-
| February 2, 2010
| {{moon|7|8|1}}
| 3
| 4
| +12%
| +20%
|}
|}
--[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 20:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 20:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
*If there's another distinct moonlight/dark day that still has it at 12%, I'd send in a bug report.  Might be warranted to just send one in now.  12% seems like a weird bonus to give statically.  Unless this, was, like, the 12th time something related to this was done.  Or if it was in December?  Dunno.  --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 01:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
** Makes sense to me.  It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --[[User:Bob452|Bob452]] 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
*** That's what I figured (although there were 13 winners if memory serves).  If it's 12 on February 1 I'm just assuming it's 12.  --[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 14:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
*** Man, I hope it's not based on the month of the KoL year.  If it is, it won't change until February 4. --[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 14:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
*** Ok, that's more than enough of that.  I'll try to remember to check it later in the week when it's a different KoL month, but it looks like it's +X% stats, where X is the number of months in a year. --[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 15:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:51, 2 February 2010

I'm a little concerned that I will accidentally click the "discard" option on this one day.

Is the % stat change based on the moons like the paintbrush and beret?--Sirjeffreyofvistledorf 18:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

If it is, it's not the same formula.
Date Moons Total Brightness Grimace Darkness Ascot Bonus Beret Bonus
January 27, 2010
4 0 +12% +0%
January 28, 2010
4 1 +12% +5%
January 29, 2010
5 2 +12% +10%
January 30, 2010
5 2 +12% +10%
January 31, 2010
6 2 +12% +10%
February 1, 2010
6 2 +12% +10%
February 2, 2010
3 4 +12% +20%

--Johnny Treehugger 20:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

  • If there's another distinct moonlight/dark day that still has it at 12%, I'd send in a bug report. Might be warranted to just send one in now. 12% seems like a weird bonus to give statically. Unless this, was, like, the 12th time something related to this was done. Or if it was in December? Dunno. --Flargen 01:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Makes sense to me. It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --Bob452 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
      • That's what I figured (although there were 13 winners if memory serves). If it's 12 on February 1 I'm just assuming it's 12. --Johnny Treehugger 14:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
      • Man, I hope it's not based on the month of the KoL year. If it is, it won't change until February 4. --Johnny Treehugger 14:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
      • Ok, that's more than enough of that. I'll try to remember to check it later in the week when it's a different KoL month, but it looks like it's +X% stats, where X is the number of months in a year. --Johnny Treehugger 15:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)