Talk:Monster Compendium: Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>Club In which I argue for deleting these. |
imported>Erich No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*Crimbo 2012 | *Crimbo 2012 | ||
And that's just supposing it was up to date before those edits, an uncertain point. The [[Monster Manuel]] pages will probably work better than these for this sort of monster listing now, since those are much more likely to be maintained. --{{User:Club/sig}} 20:52, 13 December 2012 (CET) | And that's just supposing it was up to date before those edits, an uncertain point. The [[Monster Manuel]] pages will probably work better than these for this sort of monster listing now, since those are much more likely to be maintained. --{{User:Club/sig}} 20:52, 13 December 2012 (CET) | ||
* I agree, but what about monsters not listed by Manuel? I think the compendium should be reduced to monsters with no entries, and maybe the name changed to reflect that. What do you think? {{User:Erich/sig}} 21:01, 13 December 2012 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 13 December 2012
Do we need these pages? No one updates them:
- Monster Compendium (1 to E)
- One "new" monster (really just split the two "the darnkess" links) since May 2009.
- Monster Compendium (F to M)
- Four "new" monsters (really just splitting two nemesis ones into their different forms) since July 2011.
- Monster Compendium (N to S)
- Eight "new" monsters (really just splitting the four nemesis ones into their different forms) since July 2011.
- Monster Compendium (T to Z)
- No changes at all since February 2011.
Let's see what that leaves out.
- Drunksgiving
- New monsters in The Cyrpt revamp
- Valhalla Invasion
- Pile of old servers
- Various challenge path specific monsters
- Crimbo 2011
- The Suburbs of Dis
- The Hidden Temple revamp
- Assorted mimes
- Brushfires
- Black crayon monsters
- Mt. McLargeHuge revamp
- The Orc Chasm revamp
- Crimbo 2012
And that's just supposing it was up to date before those edits, an uncertain point. The Monster Manuel pages will probably work better than these for this sort of monster listing now, since those are much more likely to be maintained. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 20:52, 13 December 2012 (CET)