Talk:Party hat: Difference between revisions
imported>TW m Addendum to my previous. And I don't care if I mispelled Addendum or not. |
imported>Kaiou mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
EDIT: And as soon as I write this, they change the description! BAH. --[[User:TW|TW]] 23:29, 25 October 2007 (CDT) | EDIT: And as soon as I write this, they change the description! BAH. --[[User:TW|TW]] 23:29, 25 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Has anyone pulverized this yet, and if so what did it yield?--[[User:Xclockwatcher|Xclockwatcher]] 13:56, 26 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Useless powder.--[[User:Ryo Sangnoir|Ryo Sangnoir]] 14:09, 26 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
:For a short time, it gave twinkly powder. This was fixed a minute or two later. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 14:11, 26 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
it don't show up in mall search and it has a placeholder image, in stores. is that worth to be mentioned? --[[User:Kaiou|Kaiou]] 14:21, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 October 2007
So what else does it do? An empty space usually means a secret enchantment that is either hidden or simply not written by the devs as of yet. --Tripwood 23:20, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
Let's hope the secret property still works on days other than Jarlsberg Day. That'd be a killer low-level item to equip. But I bet it'll only work today (and on future Jarlsberg Days) as does seem to be more than a little game-breaking. Plus it goes with the theme of Dependence Day fireworks only working on... well, Dependence Day. Cough.
EDIT: And as soon as I write this, they change the description! BAH. --TW 23:29, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
Has anyone pulverized this yet, and if so what did it yield?--Xclockwatcher 13:56, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
- Useless powder.--Ryo Sangnoir 14:09, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
- For a short time, it gave twinkly powder. This was fixed a minute or two later. --Flargen 14:11, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
it don't show up in mall search and it has a placeholder image, in stores. is that worth to be mentioned? --Kaiou 14:21, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
