Talk:Staff of Blood and Pudding: Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>El taco No edit summary |
imported>Evilkolbot |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Because it contains a quest item. on another note, staff of blood and pudding obviously references Blood Pudding. --[[user:el taco|someone you don't know]]00:38, 5 November 2007 (CST) | * Because it contains a quest item. on another note, staff of blood and pudding obviously references Blood Pudding. --[[user:el taco|someone you don't know]]00:38, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ||
==abomination== | |||
*what is it with the yanks and their purposeful perversion of pudding? now, [[Wikipedia:Spotted dick|this is pudding]]. --[[User:Evilkolbot|Evilkolbot]] 22:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Are you referring to the line "It does not normally contain actual pudding."? Edit it out if you want. You could replace it with something like "In British usage 'pudding' refers to a method of cooking, not a type of dessert." --{{User:Club/sig}} 00:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
***it has several meanings. i've had pudding for tea, but i've never had tea for pudding. i'm not entirely sure i could be succinct enough. perhaps a note about what, exactly, americans mean by pudding would be in order. --[[User:Evilkolbot|Evilkolbot]] 22:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:04, 15 January 2010
Jiggle Combat text: "You jiggle the staff toward your opponent. A stream of blood bursts from her body and pours into yours, dealing (6-10) damage and healing you.
You gain (6-10 same) hit points." I only tried this 5-6 times, so the range may be inaccurate.) --Bobaloo 16:13, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
Smashing yields a twinkly powder. --Tim teh pwner 03:56, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
- seems that this is the only staff that requires something non-tradable --jeremypv 22:04, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
- Because it contains a quest item. on another note, staff of blood and pudding obviously references Blood Pudding. --someone you don't know00:38, 5 November 2007 (CST)
abomination
- what is it with the yanks and their purposeful perversion of pudding? now, this is pudding. --Evilkolbot 22:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the line "It does not normally contain actual pudding."? Edit it out if you want. You could replace it with something like "In British usage 'pudding' refers to a method of cooking, not a type of dessert." --Club (#66669) (Talk) 00:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- it has several meanings. i've had pudding for tea, but i've never had tea for pudding. i'm not entirely sure i could be succinct enough. perhaps a note about what, exactly, americans mean by pudding would be in order. --Evilkolbot 22:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the line "It does not normally contain actual pudding."? Edit it out if you want. You could replace it with something like "In British usage 'pudding' refers to a method of cooking, not a type of dessert." --Club (#66669) (Talk) 00:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
