User:Pnan: Difference between revisions

From A KoL Wiki
imported>Pnan
No edit summary
imported>Pnan
Feel free to add to, edit, clean up, make pretty, etc this User Page (MMG stuff) im a html n00b
Line 1: Line 1:
==Martingale System Analysis for the MMG - Calculating Initial Bet==
[[image:Oldman.gif|center]]


Total Meat Willing to Lose ÷ '''{X}''' = Initial Bet
==Martingale System Analysis for the MMG==
 
Let '''{B}''' equal the initial bet, which is multiplied by '''{M}''' upon each loss. 
<table border=1, center>
<tr>
<td>Bet #</td>
<td>Bet value</td>
<td>Net Meat after Losing '''N''' Bets</td>
<td>Net Meat after Winning the '''N'''th Bet</td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
<td>N</td>
<td>'''B'''('''M'''<sup>N-1</sup>)</td>
<td>-'''B'''('''M'''<sup>N</sup>-1)</td>
<td>'''B'''-.002'''B'''('''M'''<sup>N-1</sup>))</td>
</tr>
 
</table>
 
 
 
==Calculating Initial Bet==
 
*for '''{M}'''=2
 
Total Meat Willing to Lose ÷ '''{X}''' = '''{B}'''


(Double your bet if you lose)
(Double your bet if you lose)
Line 16: Line 42:
<td>chance of losing it all</td>
<td>chance of losing it all</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
Line 22: Line 47:
<td>50%</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
Line 29: Line 52:
<td>25%</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
Line 37: Line 57:
<td>12.5%</td>
<td>12.5%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>4</td>
Line 45: Line 62:
<td>6.25%</td>
<td>6.25%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>5</td>
Line 53: Line 67:
<td>3.125%</td>
<td>3.125%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>6</td>
Line 61: Line 72:
<td>1.5625%</td>
<td>1.5625%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
Line 69: Line 77:
<td>0.78125%</td>
<td>0.78125%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>8</td>
Line 77: Line 82:
<td>0.390625%</td>
<td>0.390625%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>9</td>
Line 85: Line 87:
<td>0.1953125%</td>
<td>0.1953125%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>10</td>
Line 93: Line 92:
<td>0.09765625%</td>
<td>0.09765625%</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>


...where '''X'''='''M'''<sup>N</sup>-1


</table>
the multiplier is usually 2, but can be higher for increased returns.


== Playing with Caution ==


Caution!! if you lose 9 bets in a row, the chance that you will lose the 10th bet is still 50%, so the percentages are somewhat misleading.  Also, assuming a 1% chance of failure, after 100 bets, that chance of failure becomes 100% (statistically).  If you play long enough, you WILL lose it all, so know when to stop.
If you lose 9 bets in a row, the chance that you will lose the 10th bet is still 50%, so the percentages are somewhat misleading. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy Gambler's Fallacy] Also, assuming a 1% chance of failure, after 100 bets, that chance of failure becomes 100% (statistically).  If you play long enough, you WILL lose it all, so know when to stop.


A technique to speed up the process of betting is to make bets in waves of 10. If 3 bets won and 7 lost, you would initiate 10 more bets (3 normal, 7 doubled).  This method shows how the Martingale System falls apart because you could consistently win 9 bets, but lose the "same" bet over again, resulting in losing all of your meat at a 90% win rateAll bets are independent, so the order does not matter, but making successive bets linearly the illusion of having a better chance.  If you win a majority of the 10 bets, it is best to start with a fresh 10 bets since you already made a profit.  Following the same logic, if you lose 6 and win 4, then you should only double 3, or 6-(4-1), of the bets, since the 4 wins swallow up 3 of the losses.
A technique to speed up the process of betting is to make bets in waves of 10. If 3 bets win and 7 lose, you would initiate 10 more bets (3 normal, 7 doubled).  This method shows how the Martingale System falls apart because you could consistently win 9 bets, but lose the "same" bet over again, resulting in losing all of your meat at a 90% win rate (All bets are independent, so the order does not matter. Making successive bets creates the ''illusion'' of having a better chance).  If you win a majority of the 10 bets, it is best to start with a fresh 10 bets since you already made a profit.  Following the same logic, if you lose 6 and win 4, then you should only double 3, or 6-(4-1), of the bets, since the 4 wins swallow up 3 of the losses.

Revision as of 04:54, 13 October 2008

Martingale System Analysis for the MMG

Let {B} equal the initial bet, which is multiplied by {M} upon each loss.

Bet # Bet value Net Meat after Losing N Bets Net Meat after Winning the Nth Bet
N B(MN-1) -B(MN-1) B-.002B(MN-1))


Calculating Initial Bet

  • for {M}=2

Total Meat Willing to Lose ÷ {X} = {B}

(Double your bet if you lose)


I am confident that I will not lose {N} bets in a row


{N} {X} chance of losing it all
1 1 50%
2 3 25%
3 7 12.5%
4 15 6.25%
5 31 3.125%
6 63 1.5625%
7 127 0.78125%
8 255 0.390625%
9 511 0.1953125%
10 1023 0.09765625%

...where X=MN-1

the multiplier is usually 2, but can be higher for increased returns.

Playing with Caution

If you lose 9 bets in a row, the chance that you will lose the 10th bet is still 50%, so the percentages are somewhat misleading. See Gambler's Fallacy Also, assuming a 1% chance of failure, after 100 bets, that chance of failure becomes 100% (statistically). If you play long enough, you WILL lose it all, so know when to stop.

A technique to speed up the process of betting is to make bets in waves of 10. If 3 bets win and 7 lose, you would initiate 10 more bets (3 normal, 7 doubled). This method shows how the Martingale System falls apart because you could consistently win 9 bets, but lose the "same" bet over again, resulting in losing all of your meat at a 90% win rate (All bets are independent, so the order does not matter. Making successive bets creates the illusion of having a better chance). If you win a majority of the 10 bets, it is best to start with a fresh 10 bets since you already made a profit. Following the same logic, if you lose 6 and win 4, then you should only double 3, or 6-(4-1), of the bets, since the 4 wins swallow up 3 of the losses.