Talk:Annual Ascot: Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>Bob452 No edit summary |
imported>Johnny Treehugger m Surprise! |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| January 29, 2010 | | January 29, 2010 | ||
| {{moon|3|6|4}} | | {{moon|3|6|4}} | ||
| 5 | |||
| 2 | |||
| +12% | |||
| +10% | |||
|- | |||
| January 30, 2010 | |||
| {{moon|4|6|6}} | |||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 36: | Line 43: | ||
*If there's another distinct moonlight/dark day that still has it at 12%, I'd send in a bug report. Might be warranted to just send one in now. 12% seems like a weird bonus to give statically. Unless this, was, like, the 12th time something related to this was done. Or if it was in December? Dunno. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 01:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | *If there's another distinct moonlight/dark day that still has it at 12%, I'd send in a bug report. Might be warranted to just send one in now. 12% seems like a weird bonus to give statically. Unless this, was, like, the 12th time something related to this was done. Or if it was in December? Dunno. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 01:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
** Makes sense to me. It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --[[User:Bob452|Bob452]] 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | ** Makes sense to me. It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --[[User:Bob452|Bob452]] 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*** That's what I figured (although there were 13 winners if memory serves). If it's 12 on February 1 I'm just assuming it's 12. --[[User:Johnny Treehugger|Johnny Treehugger]] 14:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:00, 30 January 2010
I'm a little concerned that I will accidentally click the "discard" option on this one day.
Is the % stat change based on the moons like the paintbrush and beret?--Sirjeffreyofvistledorf 18:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- If it is, it's not the same formula.
| Date | Moons | Total Brightness | Grimace Darkness | Ascot Bonus | Beret Bonus | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 27, 2010 |
|
4 | 0 | +12% | +0% | |||||
| January 28, 2010 |
|
4 | 1 | +12% | +5% | |||||
| January 29, 2010 |
|
5 | 2 | +12% | +10% | |||||
| January 30, 2010 |
|
5 | 2 | +12% | +10% |
--Johnny Treehugger 20:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- If there's another distinct moonlight/dark day that still has it at 12%, I'd send in a bug report. Might be warranted to just send one in now. 12% seems like a weird bonus to give statically. Unless this, was, like, the 12th time something related to this was done. Or if it was in December? Dunno. --Flargen 01:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --Bob452 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- That's what I figured (although there were 13 winners if memory serves). If it's 12 on February 1 I'm just assuming it's 12. --Johnny Treehugger 14:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. It's an *annual* ascot - 12 months, 12 winners, etc. --Bob452 08:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
