Talk:Boss Bat: Difference between revisions

From A KoL Wiki
imported>'Ivan
imported>Quietust
Line 7: Line 7:
''"He headbutts you, with both heads. And both foreheads. All eight heads, then."''<BR>Hmph, surely that adds up to ''ten'' heads? Both heads + both foreheads = 2 + 2*4 = 10. This bothers me greatly. --[[User:Eitheladar|Eitheladar]] 05:19, 1 March 2007 (CST)
''"He headbutts you, with both heads. And both foreheads. All eight heads, then."''<BR>Hmph, surely that adds up to ''ten'' heads? Both heads + both foreheads = 2 + 2*4 = 10. This bothers me greatly. --[[User:Eitheladar|Eitheladar]] 05:19, 1 March 2007 (CST)
*Just looking at the sentence without thinking too much about the logical aspect of it, I would ''think'' perhaps literal wordplay. (Read: It could be including the "heads" in "headbutts".) xD --[[User:'Ivan|&#39;Ivan]] 05:25, 1 March 2007 (CST)
*Just looking at the sentence without thinking too much about the logical aspect of it, I would ''think'' perhaps literal wordplay. (Read: It could be including the "heads" in "headbutts".) xD --[[User:'Ivan|&#39;Ivan]] 05:25, 1 March 2007 (CST)
**For some reason, this reminds me of the "logic" that leads to the conclusion of Alexander the Great having an infinite number of arms or horses having an infinite number of legs (forearmed -> four-armed, forelegs -> four legs). --{{User:Quietust/sig}} 11:54, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:54, 11 June 2007

  • I beat the boss bat on my first ascension (no zodiac sign) so I was unable to get to the MCD yet I still got boss bat britches. --Jedibob5 16:30, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
    • That's not possible. Are you sure there was no mistake?--SomeStranger (Talk | Contribs) 17:48, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
    • You must be mistaken, because that isn't possible. --wexer9 07:07, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Only eight heads?

"He headbutts you, with both heads. And both foreheads. All eight heads, then."
Hmph, surely that adds up to ten heads? Both heads + both foreheads = 2 + 2*4 = 10. This bothers me greatly. --Eitheladar 05:19, 1 March 2007 (CST)

  • Just looking at the sentence without thinking too much about the logical aspect of it, I would think perhaps literal wordplay. (Read: It could be including the "heads" in "headbutts".) xD --'Ivan 05:25, 1 March 2007 (CST)
    • For some reason, this reminds me of the "logic" that leads to the conclusion of Alexander the Great having an infinite number of arms or horses having an infinite number of legs (forearmed -> four-armed, forelegs -> four legs). --Quietust (t|c) 11:54, 11 June 2007 (CDT)