Talk:Double-Fisted Skull Smashing: Difference between revisions
imported>Carl No edit summary |
imported>Fernando Bono No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The damage formula given here is either exceptionally poorly expressed, or flat wrong. I currently am not quite certain what the formula actually is, having seen numbers that don't make sense given what I thought it was. I'll do some research before making any changes. --[[User:Carl|Carl]] 13:44, 2 May 2006 (CDT) | The damage formula given here is either exceptionally poorly expressed, or flat wrong. I currently am not quite certain what the formula actually is, having seen numbers that don't make sense given what I thought it was. I'll do some research before making any changes. --[[User:Carl|Carl]] 13:44, 2 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
As far as I can tell, the off-handed weapon does 1/5 to 1/6 of it's power in damage. That's easier to calculate for anyone. --[[User:Fernando Bono|Fernando Bono]] 13:32, 15 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:32, 15 May 2006
I just had the question, is the extra weapon replacing the off hand item? if so its not really that usefull. There are offhand items that provide certain benefits you will not find in a weapon....--Shlaan 06:51, 8 March 2006 (CST)
- Yes, your second weapon is in your off hand. No, it's still useful, since there are weapons that provide benefits you can't get from off hand items (see ice sickle). --Crowther 07:23, 8 March 2006 (CST)
Its mentioned that the Huge Mirror Shard must be the main weapon, but what about the Wand of Nagamar? Does that have to be in the Main Hand? Or can you leave that in the offhand, meaning that the Weapon in your Main Hand can be a better one. And anyone who fought the NS when Ascension was released but before knowing you needed the Wand on knows that she goes down alot quicker then. DaCyclops 21:07, 10 March 2006 (CST)
The damage formula given here is either exceptionally poorly expressed, or flat wrong. I currently am not quite certain what the formula actually is, having seen numbers that don't make sense given what I thought it was. I'll do some research before making any changes. --Carl 13:44, 2 May 2006 (CDT)
As far as I can tell, the off-handed weapon does 1/5 to 1/6 of it's power in damage. That's easier to calculate for anyone. --Fernando Bono 13:32, 15 May 2006 (CDT)
