Talk:Meat vortex: Difference between revisions

From A KoL Wiki
imported>Carados
No edit summary
imported>J12601
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


*I believe Nethack references HHGTG in this case, or they came up with the phrase indepentally.-[[User:Carados|Carados]] 09:11, 23 February 2006 (Central Standard Time)
*I believe Nethack references HHGTG in this case, or they came up with the phrase indepentally.-[[User:Carados|Carados]] 09:11, 23 February 2006 (Central Standard Time)
*Diminishing returns?  I just used four of these in a row on a cubist bull and got 150, 53, 53, 4 meat, so I stopped on that one.  Next bull I encountered gave 134 for the first vortex, and I did not use the rest.  Has anyone else tried figuring out if there is in fact a decreasing rate of return the more you use during one combat?  --[[User:J12601|J12601]] 17:21, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 23:21, 21 November 2006

Puff of Annoying

I was under the impression that 'vanishes in a puff of annoying' was a nethack refrence [1]. This itself is a HHGTTG refrence "The throne vanishes in a puff of logic." and the refrence in 31337 scroll. However, a throne vanishing in a puff of logic is much more similar (along with stealing some money - if it refrenced any other of the Nethack throne messages there wouldn't be any question) and annoying to the Meat vortex than God vanishing in a puff of logic. The question remains does anyone know the mind of Jick? --Shagie 18:05, 28 Aug 2005 (Central Daylight Time)


  • I believe Nethack references HHGTG in this case, or they came up with the phrase indepentally.-Carados 09:11, 23 February 2006 (Central Standard Time)


  • Diminishing returns? I just used four of these in a row on a cubist bull and got 150, 53, 53, 4 meat, so I stopped on that one. Next bull I encountered gave 134 for the first vortex, and I did not use the rest. Has anyone else tried figuring out if there is in fact a decreasing rate of return the more you use during one combat? --J12601 17:21, 21 November 2006 (CST)