Talk:Monster Manuel (Entries): Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>Poit Narf No edit summary |
imported>Fig bucket m not a big deal... |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Certainly this page will need to be split into several pages (although that is an established strategy for large pages). I wasn't sure if adding a new section to each monster would be better than this, but decided this centralized the editing. Perhaps a [[Discussion|discussion]] is required? Another question to consider is whether we should modify attack/defense/hp in the Data pages to match the manuel entries... --[[User:Fig bucket|Fig bucket]] 02:33, 19 September 2012 (CEST) | *Certainly this page will need to be split into several pages (although that is an established strategy for large pages). I wasn't sure if adding a new section to each monster would be better than this, but decided this centralized the editing. Perhaps a [[Discussion|discussion]] is required? Another question to consider is whether we should modify attack/defense/hp in the Data pages to match the manuel entries... --[[User:Fig bucket|Fig bucket]] 02:33, 19 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
**I edited one monster data to match the Manuel entry. Should I not have done that? --[[User:Poit Narf|Poit Narf]] 02:49, 19 September 2012 (CEST) | **I edited one monster data to match the Manuel entry. Should I not have done that? --[[User:Poit Narf|Poit Narf]] 02:49, 19 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
***Not a big problem. I'm likely being a bit over-cautious---it's not clear how accurate the data is, and it would be nice to have confirmation that everyone gets the same values, or to figure out what variance the manuel data has. --[[User:Fig bucket|Fig bucket]] 03:00, 19 September 2012 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:00, 19 September 2012
Wouldn't it be better if we added it to the monster template? Spread it out, because, DANG, this page is going to be HUGE. --Johnny Treehugger 02:27, 19 September 2012 (CEST)
- Certainly this page will need to be split into several pages (although that is an established strategy for large pages). I wasn't sure if adding a new section to each monster would be better than this, but decided this centralized the editing. Perhaps a discussion is required? Another question to consider is whether we should modify attack/defense/hp in the Data pages to match the manuel entries... --Fig bucket 02:33, 19 September 2012 (CEST)
- I edited one monster data to match the Manuel entry. Should I not have done that? --Poit Narf 02:49, 19 September 2012 (CEST)
- Not a big problem. I'm likely being a bit over-cautious---it's not clear how accurate the data is, and it would be nice to have confirmation that everyone gets the same values, or to figure out what variance the manuel data has. --Fig bucket 03:00, 19 September 2012 (CEST)
- I edited one monster data to match the Manuel entry. Should I not have done that? --Poit Narf 02:49, 19 September 2012 (CEST)
