Talk:Reagent dish: Difference between revisions
imported>Aprocalypse No edit summary |
imported>Club not a "relatively simple food" |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Umm... the adventure gains on the reagent foods are faaaar from correct. I also can't remember EVER getting 31 on a chow O.o --[[User:Aprocalypse|Aprocalypse]] 19:03, 27 January 2006 (Central Standard Time) | Umm... the adventure gains on the reagent foods are faaaar from correct. I also can't remember EVER getting 31 on a chow O.o --[[User:Aprocalypse|Aprocalypse]] 19:03, 27 January 2006 (Central Standard Time) | ||
"A reagent dish is a relatively simple food ..." Wait, what? It requires two skills from two different classes and two cooking steps. How is that relatively simple? Prior to ascension (and now in Bad Moon), one player couldn't (can't) make it alone. (And thus in BM, it is completely unavailable.) --{{User:Club/sig}} 16:15, 10 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 10 June 2008
"As a response to this, the chow mein dishes were created that were even better than reagent dishes however being a bit more complex to create."
Hell Ramen for instance boosts all three stats while only requiring one more fullness. This seems to be an issue where they are "usually better" but maybe not absolutely better.
Umm... the adventure gains on the reagent foods are faaaar from correct. I also can't remember EVER getting 31 on a chow O.o --Aprocalypse 19:03, 27 January 2006 (Central Standard Time)
"A reagent dish is a relatively simple food ..." Wait, what? It requires two skills from two different classes and two cooking steps. How is that relatively simple? Prior to ascension (and now in Bad Moon), one player couldn't (can't) make it alone. (And thus in BM, it is completely unavailable.) --Club (#66669) (Talk) 16:15, 10 June 2008 (CDT)
