Talk:Skeleton key: Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>Taltamir No edit summary |
imported>Icon315 m reply |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Isn't "multiple different" a tad redundant? [[User:Silvermoonstar3|Silvermoonstar3]] 19:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | Isn't "multiple different" a tad redundant? [[User:Silvermoonstar3|Silvermoonstar3]] 19:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Notes vs Uses sections== | |||
Why are the various uses for this item placed under "notes" section instead of under "uses" section? --[[User:Taltamir|Taltamir]] ([[User talk:Taltamir|talk]]) 07:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | Why are the various uses for this item placed under "notes" section instead of under "uses" section? --[[User:Taltamir|Taltamir]] ([[User talk:Taltamir|talk]]) 07:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
*The reason for that is that the '''"Uses"''' section is crafting recipes, not for actual uses of the item. I agree that the naming scheme can be a little confusing. --[[User:Icon315|Icon315♕]] ([[User talk:Icon315|☎]]|[[Special:Contributions/Icon315|♤]]) 07:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:41, 22 October 2017
I doubt the vaildity of that wikipedia link in references. Skeleton keys have been around for a lot longer than that movie.
- That's true, that reference is wrong. I'm taking it out. (Also, remember to sign your posts on discussion pages, by pressing the second button on the right, at the top of the text field) --Pcentella 17:35, 11 Nov 2005 (MST)
Isn't "multiple different" a tad redundant? Silvermoonstar3 19:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Notes vs Uses sections
Why are the various uses for this item placed under "notes" section instead of under "uses" section? --Taltamir (talk) 07:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)