Talk:Tiny slimy cyst: Difference between revisions
imported>Quietust merge tables together |
imported>Melon |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[green peawee marble]] | |[[green peawee marble]] | ||
! | !102 | ||
!53. | !53.7 | ||
!50 | !50 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[brown crock marble]] | |[[brown crock marble]] | ||
! | !44 | ||
! | !23.1 | ||
!25 | !25 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[red China marble]] | |[[red China marble]] | ||
! | !23 | ||
! | !12.1 | ||
!12.5 | !12.5 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[lemonade marble]] | |[[lemonade marble]] | ||
! | !11 | ||
!5. | !5.8 | ||
!6.125 | !6.125 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[bumblebee marble]] | |[[bumblebee marble]] | ||
!2 | !2 | ||
!1. | !1.0 | ||
!3.125 | !3.125 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[jet bennie marble]] | |[[jet bennie marble]] | ||
!3 | !3 | ||
!1. | !1.6 | ||
!1.5625 | !1.5625 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|[[beige clambroth marble]] | |[[beige clambroth marble]] | ||
!3 | !3 | ||
!1. | !1.6 | ||
!0.78125 | !0.78125 | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|---- style="height:30px" | |---- style="height:30px" | ||
|'''Total''' | |'''Total''' | ||
! | !190 | ||
!100 | !100 | ||
!100 | !100 | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 13:20, 6 June 2009
I'm fairly certain that every type of marble can be obtained from this. Also, this may just be strange RNG, but I seem be be getting higher-class marbles when I multi-use these things. I've only ever gotten the brown marbles from single-use. --LegendaryBard 10:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is probably strange RNG. My first marble was the beach ball marble, and that was gotten from single-use.
- Perhaps the marble frequencies are related to their stage in marble creation?
- --Dfmchfhf 15:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this would make sense: 50% drop green peawees, 25% brown crocks, 12.5% red chinas, and so on. The spading numbers below are starting to look like that...--Parse 13:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Shall we start collecting data? I'll assume for now that multi-use has no effect. --TheArchivist 18:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Why is it that only the reds are multi-useable?--Crae Z 23:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- They all are...--Yungera 23:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I've received a Black Catseye from opening one, but have only received one so far. I haven't combined any of them. I think it's just very rare RNG. --JoseCuervo
I got a Big Bumboozer from a tiny cyst today. That was a nice surprise. So, it's possible.--Quine 00:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
I would venture a guess that the probability of receiving a certain marble is half as likely as the the previous lower quality with greens starting at little more then 50%. This keeps things even with the power of two theme.
That is:
(table merged with below) --Quietust (t|c) 04:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
--Demon llama 04:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Item probabilities
Outcome | Total | Percent | Expected |
---|---|---|---|
green peawee marble | 102 | 53.7 | 50 |
brown crock marble | 44 | 23.1 | 25 |
red China marble | 23 | 12.1 | 12.5 |
lemonade marble | 11 | 5.8 | 6.125 |
bumblebee marble | 2 | 1.0 | 3.125 |
jet bennie marble | 3 | 1.6 | 1.5625 |
beige clambroth marble | 3 | 1.6 | 0.78125 |
steely marble | 1 | 0.5 | 0.390625 |
beach ball marble | 1 | 0.5 | 0.1953125 |
black catseye marble | 0 | 0 | 0.09765625 |
big bumboozer marble | 0 | 0 | 0.048828125 |
Total | 190 | 100 | 100 |