Talk:Mild Lycanthropy
Obtained From
Is it possible this effect is from a Weretaco? --LegendaryBard 13:52, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- It's already been confirmed on the forums that this is at least supposed to come from the Warwelf - perhaps the weretaco will give it as well. --Quietust (t|c) 14:41, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- I got it from the Warwelf. ManyFold 04:40, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- But not the weretaco? This page has stated for over a month that the effect does indeed come from the warwelf. --TheDotGamer 09:27, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
Effect
Under the current moon arrangement
|
|
|
,these were my stats (with no effects but mild lycanthropy and no equipment):
Muscle: 239 (232)
Mysticality: 629
Moxie: 220 (226)
I'm guessing that the formula (only based on today) is +x% muscle and +y% moxie, where x is (3% * (dark - 4)), and y is (3% * (light - 4)). This is only if the mini-moon isn't factoring in..--GoldS 14:39, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
|
|
Muscle: 235 (232)
Mysticality: 651
Moxie: 224 (226)
That's +1% muscle and -1% moxie. Hmm.--GoldS 23:15, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
|
|
Muscle: 235 (232)
Mysticality: 666
Moxie: 225 (227)
+1% muscle, -1% moxie. Same as last time.--GoldS 00:11, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
- If it's the same as last, that probably means the mini-moon factors in. Yesterday gave 2 light minus 1 from the dark Mini moon. Now no light +1 from the mini moon. +1% -1% on both days... Since the day before that was 3 light and +3% -3%, I propose the effect is a simple +(light)% mus/+0 mys/-(light)%mox --King_ofthe_Dunedain 04:32, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
This effect is obviously based on moonlight. I just recieved it, soon will post moonlight and effect recieved under this moonlight.--Knobula 22:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
*Just lost effect. The only noticeable effect was +1 muscle under 3 parts moonlight. 1 part Ronald, 1 part Grimace, 1 part mini-moon. However, I just ascended, so my current unbuffed muscle is only 7; and I expect that the gain under Mild Lycanthropy is a percent gain, not a Flat Gain. People with more muscle should get more than +1 muscle with this effect.--Knobula 22:26, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
