Talk:Experimental Effect G-9
From A KoL Wiki
The effect changes from day to day. Could be moons? Could be something else. --Greycat (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
| Day | Date (US timezones) | Effect | Moons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martinus 8 | 2014-10-04 | +156% | Wereseal +50%, Baio +40%, Hairshirt +30, Depleted Grimacite +10% / +2, Jek +5/+35 |
| Bill 1 | 2014-10-05 | +269% | Wereseal +54%, Baio +50%, Hairshirt +50, Depleted Grimacite +0, Jek +4/+40 |
| Bill 2 | 2014-10-06 | +175% | Wereseal +50%, Baio +40%, Hairshirt +40, Depleted Grimacite +5% / 1, Jek +5/+35 |
| Bill 3 | 2014-10-07 | +203% | Wereseal +59%, Baio +60%, Hairshirt +40, Depleted Grimacite +5% / 1, Jek +3/+45 |
| Bill 4 | 2014-10-08 | +228% | Wereseal +59%, Baio +60%, Hairshirt +30, Depleted Grimacite +10% / 2, Jek +3/+45 |
| Bill 5 | 2014-10-09 | +153% | Wereseal +59%, Baio +60%, Hairshirt +30, Depleted Grimacite +10%/+2, Jek +3/+45 |
| Bill 6 | 2014-10-10 | +108% | Wereseal +59%, Baio +60%, Hairshirt +30, Depleted Grimacite +10%/+2, Jek +3/+45 |
| Bill 7 | 2014-10-11 | +4% | |
| Bill 8 | 2014-10-12 | +134% | |
| Bor 1 | 2014-10-13 | +213% | |
| Bor 2 | 2014-10-14 | +377% | |
| Bor 3 | 2014-10-15 | +69% | |
| Bor 4 | 2014-10-16 | +288% | |
| Bor 5 | 2014-10-17 | +382% | |
| Bor 6 | 2014-10-18 | +7% | |
| Bor 7 | 2014-10-19 | +145% | |
| Bor 8 | 2014-10-20 | +91% | |
| Petember 1 | 2014-10-21 | +318% | |
| Petember 2 | 2014-10-22 | +131% | |
| Petember 3 | 2014-10-23 | +339% | |
| Petember 4 | 2014-10-24 | +262% | |
| Petember 5 | 2014-10-25 | +375% | |
| Petember 6 | 2014-10-26 | +100% | |
| Petember 7 | 2014-10-27 | +375% | |
| Petember 8 | 2014-10-28 | +275% | |
| Carlvember 1 | 2014-10-29 | +11% | |
| Carlvember 2 | 2014-10-30 | +234% | |
| Carlvember 3 | 2014-10-31 | +222% | |
| Carlvember 4 | 2014-11-01 | +141% | |
| Porktober 1 | 2014-11-06 | +308% |
Looks like it's not the moons. --Greycat (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, given the data so far, there is no evidence it's anything other than a random number determined during rollover. Right now it looks like 1 to 300-ish, but it's still very early. --Greycat (talk) 14:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- i'm getting +377% today (14th October.) Is this consistent across players? --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- yes, it is. (for a sample size of 2) --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- i'm getting +377% today (14th October.) Is this consistent across players? --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Given a known range of 4-382, I'd agree with Greycat that it is likely a 1-400 number or 0-400. We may be facing an unknown random factor, such as a 2d200, but probability is against that given the data. The number of days ±25 of the extremes plays against multiple rolls.--Fluxxdog (talk) 17:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- or it's 4d100 and hotstuff ran the numbers for some seeds and picked one with weird outliers just to screw with us. --Evilkolbot (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Effect is at 2% today, so it's not 4d100. --Greycat (talk) 13:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Effect is 97% today.Martinus 3, 20250709, Ronald Half waxing, a small bright moon is dark yet present, and Grimace is a waxing crescent. If it matters it is a Wednesday. It is the 9th day of the 7th month...but that doesn't make sense for other days reaching 382. --Sonofjohn (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
