Talk:Roasted marshmallow
The plural is "roasted marshmallows" but I don't know how to add it to the article. --Kitsunegami 22:46, 24 January 2008 (CST)
Do we have any confirmation that these will still be useful after the holiday's over? Seems a little...reckless for the administration to put them out like that... - jonnosferatu
Confirmation will come at rollover, and probably no sooner. Too bad, really, I'd like to keep them for this Bad Moon run. --Sparksol 01:21, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- I am quite surprised, after rollover I was able to eat more of the roasted marshmallows! Woohoo! Here's hoping it stays this way (at least for the rest of my run in bad moon...)--Sparksol 00:01, 26 January 2008 (CST)
Confirmation: You can eat them on other days and you still get the effect. Now is there a cap? --Bigcalm 02:30, 26 January 2008 (CST)
The page currently lists 1-2 adventures. My never-ascended sauceror spade only ever got 1 each from the 15 he ate. It's possible I was unlucky, but it is also possible that somebody who edited the page to make it 1-2 had Gluttony or Opossum. What were other people's adventure yields? --Skin Deep 04:28, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- Just ate 15 in Bad Moon (with no Meansucker skills) and got 1 adventure each. Reverting adventure gains to 1. --Quietust (t|c) 14:46, 25 January 2008 (CST)
This item's description is correct. Charcoal on the outside, goo on the inside is a traditional toasted-to-perfection marshmallow. Where do we get the idea that the item's description is "correct"? Charcoal on the outside of anything means the outside is inedible. That's nasty. There it is: my opinion, as if it were a statement of fact. I don't think we should put subjective text like this in a KoL wiki article. I thought the wiki was for reporting facts, not stating preferences. --StorellaDeville 02:18, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- I think that was a joke... I thought it pretty funny, anyway. :) --Starwed 04:29, 25 January 2008 (CST)
- I'm with Starwed, I came to write here because Storella's "reference" is ridiculously technical. This isn't wikipedia, this is a wiki for a humor game. The reference as it is isn't even a reference--the item description explains what it's talking about, and no further explanation is needed.Lotusduck 08:01, 25 January 2008 (CST)
