Talk:Trick or Treat!
Checking for five or six blocks, I seem to find 5 fights and 7 non-combats on each block. Not sure it specials like the Fun-Size Dilemma or All-Hallow's Steve stick to those numbers or change them. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 20:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- To be even more specific 5 combats, 3 outfit non-combats, 4 other non-combats. --Chunky_boo (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't even try to count that. :^) More testing shows the dilemma is a regular one-of-seven non-combats, so probably a regular one-of-four non-outfit non-combat. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 20:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- From what I see that is true the only thing that I haven't had a chance to test is how the effect outfits (from HSH) reflect on the distribution since chat seems to say that they don't work like a normal outfit. --Chunky_boo (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't even try to count that. :^) More testing shows the dilemma is a regular one-of-seven non-combats, so probably a regular one-of-four non-outfit non-combat. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 20:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
This is choice adventure 804 now (the find a new block or leave options). Will get it on the page eventually. Discordance (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Are we sure dark houses are always combats? Because I've definitely gotten candy from "dark" houses (the shacks with the one big dark window) a few times (outfits tried: Final Boss, 8-Bit Finery, Animelf Apparel). InsanityPrelude (talk) 23:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Some dark houses have images that look exactly the same as lit ones. Guess it was an oversight. --Yatsufusa (talk) 23:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Its deliberate I believe. Despite being identical images the filenames on the kol server are different. I guess they just wanted a few houses that you couldn't be sure about. Although the filenames give it away. Discordance (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Semi-lit
Opinions on the semi-lit section? I admit its slightly clearer now that some houses are in both categories which wasn't immediately obvious on the previous version, but I think its making the page a little more clunky. Maybe it should just go before the other sections so its not hidden at the end. I can't really think of anything better right now. Maybe we should scrap my initial design of the page with houses under each section and just make a table with all the house images and explain them in one go? Discordance (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- I thought the page was a lot clearer before the addition of the "semi-lit" section. The images are very clearly divided into lit / unlit by image name, it just happens that some of them are visually the same. Adding "semi-lit" makes it seem like there's some wierd third category. --Darkcodelagsniper (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thats what I thought having done most of the original layout. ErosionSeeker added semi-lit which i've tidied up a bit. I was originally going to roll it back but thought he had a point that it wasn't immediately obvious unless you knew about the filenames that 4 houses were actually in both sections. I don't think i'd actually explained that anywhere on the page just mentioned it here on the talk. Discordance (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
