Talk:Turtleini

Some data points (various Muscle/buffs, mostly against beer bottle golems):

• Round 1: 333 (+332), with 166 passive. Round 2: 83 passive. Round 3: 42 passive. Round 4: 21 passive. Round 5: 11 passive. Round 6: nothing.
• Round 1: 375 (+372), with 186 passive. Round 2: 93 passive. Round 3: 47 passive. Round 4: 24 passive. Round 5: 12 passive. Round 6: nothing.
• Round 1: 368 (+364), with 182 passive. Round 2: 91 passive. Round 3: 46 passive. Round 4: 23 passive. Round 5: 12 passive. Round 6: nothing.
• Round 1: 516 (+493), with 247 passive. Round 2: 124 passive. Round 3: 62 passive. Round 4: 31 passive. Round 5: 16 passive. Round 6: nothing.

--Greycat (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

More data:

• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 1528 Muscle: Turtleini did 477 (+498) and 477 (+485)
• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 1602 Muscle: Turtleini did critical 1005 (+970)
• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 1652 Muscle: Turtleini did 510 (+513) and 518 (+535) and 520 (+522)
• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 1773 Muscle: Turtleini did 537 (+543) and 554 (+556) and 561 (+541)

Most of these (ignoring the critical hit) seem to match 32-64 +Mus/4 +bonus_spell_dmg -- the exception is the 535 result on line 3 (64+1652/4+55 only gives 532). None of them fit the formula currently on the article page (64-96 +Mus/4). --Greycat (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

More data:

• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 2969 Muscle: Turtleini did critical 1648 (+1703), and 839 (+847)
• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 3535 Muscle: Turtleini did 989 (+984), and 978 (+987), and 991 (+1001)
• +55 spell damage, +20% spell damage, 2228 Muscle: Turtleini did 649 (+657), and 667 (+653), and 667 (+662), and 678 (+655)

Once again, the 678 result on the final line is just over the 32-64 range's prediction (by 2 points). The previous 535 is over by 3 points. No results have been under the range yet, or even at the bottom. I think the lowest result so far has been the 649 (from 2228), in a predicted range of 644-676. Maybe the actual range is more like 35-70? --Greycat (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Just for the record, 4266 Muscle followed the same pattern (expected range 1153-1185, got 1186 damage on two separate points). --Greycat (talk) 17:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)