Template talk:Cloathing
From A KoL Wiki
ARGH! The SIZE of it. Can't this be made MUCH smaller? It's okay for a one time use, but as a footer template it's ungainly. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 16:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- perhaps more like the tp one with three rows. --Evilkolbot (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Except for swapping images for belt and boots, much better. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 00:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- now it's all nice and tiny, perhaps there's room for the item names under the images. you get them on mouseover but might it be nice to see them on the page? there's also that it's a bit narrow as it is. --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Nice, but yes I prefer your new version. --Fig bucket (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- now it's all nice and tiny, perhaps there's room for the item names under the images. you get them on mouseover but might it be nice to see them on the page? there's also that it's a bit narrow as it is. --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Except for swapping images for belt and boots, much better. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 00:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- good call, cool12309. i like the addition of dad, makes it. thanks. --Evilkolbot (talk) 22:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- c: — Cool12309 (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's a little odd at 800px wide (browser window size) but not bad at larger. Still vastly improved over the original, and probably more useful like this. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 02:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- c: — Cool12309 (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
"Attempt to show the type of equipment"
- Why text x 3 instead of column headers / footers? --Club (#66669) (Talk) 02:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- I actually thought of this a couple hours after I made the change; at the time, I wasn't sure if they were exactly the same. But I'm lazy. Feel free to make a header. — Cool12309 (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
name change
- I move it from Cloathing to Clothing because, well, the misspelling drove me nuts, but for some reason, I almost think it was spelled wrong for a reason.... arg. There is no way nobody noticed it wasn't spelled correctly, right? I feel like I am missing something. Eh, things can always be undone. --JRSiebz (☎|§|‡) 09:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- not a misspelling exactly. it's a contraction. C-loathing. clothing of loathing. geddit? i suppose we may need to add a real "clothing" template at some point. i'd say it was fine as it was. perhaps a note in the noinclude bit to explain it. --Evilkolbot (talk) 12:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- oh i gets it. My brain failed at that last night, well it's in the talk page now, so yeah. --JRSiebz (☎|§|‡) 03:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
