User talk:Eaglewing2

Hey, you added a line about the strange shiny disc having no use "because Jick has not created a use yet."- What's your source? --Unnatural20 05:54, 30 January 2008 (CST)

I sort of did put in my source. Please remember that other people can easily remove what someone put in. --Eaglewing 16:55, 19 February 2008 (CST)

Should that entire comment even be present without a source? If nothing is confirmed, shouldn't "There is no use for it..." be removed entirely?--Strwrsfrk 07:38, 30 January 2008 (CST)

What the hell are you even talking about? --Eaglewing 16:55, 19 February 2008 (CST)

• What we mean is that on strange shiny disc, you should not have stated "there is no use because Jick has not created a use yet." It is possible that there is an undiscovered use. Or, if it your statement is true, then you have to have evidence (i.e. The Jick Show at <date> or "Jick has stated on the forums that...", etc.) --CG1:t,c,e 18:41, 19 February 2008 (CST)

The "there is no use for it" was already there, and I had the source on the site. It's not my fault if people can edit things and remove them. --Eaglewing 16:46, 24 February 2008 (CST)

• Actually, looking at the article history, the "no use" comment was not already there. The speculation at talk is not conclusive evidence. In addition, we have stated what article we talked about unlike what's mentioned on your user page, because Unnatural20 clearly mentioned the strange shiny disc. --CG1:t,c,e 18:33, 24 February 2008 (CST)

Actually, the way it looked, it seemed as if it was two seperate offenses, and there really is no use for the CD yet, so really I haven't done anything wrong. --Eaglewing 09:52, 9 March 2008 (CDT)