User talk:Improv

Disease

By any chance are you using a Greasemonkey script to automatically pickpocket items (and list them as "You yoink an item: [item name]" at the end of combat)? --Quietust (t|c) 01:21, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

• Nope. --Improv 10:02, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Deleting 100% relevant information

Please don't delete almost entire articles by considering 100% relevant and useful information as junk, like you did to otori

Thanks--George lin 01:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

• That was actually reasonably acceptable, because there's been discussion over whether or not the information in otori was relevant, or useful. --CG1:t,c,e 03:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
• Perhaps it was "reasonably acceptable", perhaps it was not - to my mind we did not come to a conclusion on the discussion page. Anyways: After someone readded the content I would expect everyone to discuss the matter again. And not to start some kind of edit wars. Just my two cents...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scheijan (talk • contribs) on 02:53, 13 October 2009
  • If you look at the time stamps on the discussion page, discussion was being made as the content was being removed. Removing a bunch of information and then readding the important points is probably a easier way to go than selectively cutting out parts anyways. --CG1:t,c,e 06:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Tome of Transcendent Olfaction

When you use the tome, Transcendent Olfaction is actually marked as Hardcore Permanent. According to Ricket, here, Jick confirmed the skill to be Hardcore Permanent on a radio show. Just thought you might want to know so that you don't revert my statement on the tome page. --CG1:t,c,e 11:08, 22 July 2007 (CDT)

0 turns

You can view effect descriptions in-game without having the effect active on your character. In this case it gives a "0 turns" display of the effect, should the effect be turn dependent. For many effects this means there is no blue entry at all, but for the recent crimbo potions it means weirdness. --Flargen 02:55, 29 January 2012 (CET)

• Given that this is just a glitch and cannot actually provide any such effect, I suggest it's not worth noting this on the effect pages. --Improv 04:53, 29 January 2012 (CET)