User talk:Keska
From A KoL Wiki
Gnomish
Don't do something like that with no prior discussion, alright? --TechSmurf 19:31, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
- Discussion is on Talk:Haiku_katana#Awesome_vs_Not_Awesome and I'm still in the process of filling in the links to it. Don't jump on multi-page edits that are obviously in progress *right now*, alright? --Keska 19:38, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
- A theoretical suggestion for the sake of an argument is not a discussion. There's no reason to edit the Gnomish pages like that, and the Haiku Katana doesn't count as a precedence-- that's still being discussed. --TechSmurf 19:44, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
- There's no "reason" to write the haiku page like that either, and yet it's currently written that way. This is how wikis work: changes happen before discussion, not after. And the discussion is overwhelmingly in support of pages formatted in the style of silly textual jokes, so it's obvious which side is going to win this one. --Keska 06:25, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- You did notice the giant page of discussion over the change, right? As opposed to the total lack of discussion and support for this change? Seriously, enough with this idiotic argument. --TechSmurf 12:16, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- I noticed the discussion, which is overwhelmingly in favour of this. Do you have anything to contribute other than calling people idiots? If not, please go find something useful to do, and quit reverting changes just because you don't agree with them. --Keska 07:50, 8 September 2008 (CDT)
- I agree with Techsmurf. Major/debatable changes are usually discussed first. --CG1:t,c,e 14:29, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- Major? Hardly. Debatable? Perhaps, but nobody has so far, which tends to suggest otherwise. I note that you have not done so. First? Not on wikis. Usually? Cite your source. --Keska 07:50, 8 September 2008 (CDT)
- yes, the side that's going to win this one is obvious. strike three, it's the one with techsmurf on. --Evilkolbot 14:59, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- Also not how wikis work. If you want that sort of environment, head on over to citizendium, and revel in the way that extensive authority and review has resulted in a huge collection of pages. --Keska 07:50, 8 September 2008 (CDT)
- what part of three mods telling you you behaved inappropriately do you not get? this wiki works on consensus mostly. people do decide to act without discussion but their edits don't last very long. and huffiness and high moral tone without a backing of hundreds of successful edits really don't win you any friends. walk into a room and start shouting your mouth off you better be absolutely certain that what you want to say is what people want to hear or you're going to find yourself being forced to walk right back out again. --Evilkolbot 14:39, 8 September 2008 (CDT)
- Also not how wikis work. If you want that sort of environment, head on over to citizendium, and revel in the way that extensive authority and review has resulted in a huge collection of pages. --Keska 07:50, 8 September 2008 (CDT)
- You did notice the giant page of discussion over the change, right? As opposed to the total lack of discussion and support for this change? Seriously, enough with this idiotic argument. --TechSmurf 12:16, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- There's no "reason" to write the haiku page like that either, and yet it's currently written that way. This is how wikis work: changes happen before discussion, not after. And the discussion is overwhelmingly in support of pages formatted in the style of silly textual jokes, so it's obvious which side is going to win this one. --Keska 06:25, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- A theoretical suggestion for the sake of an argument is not a discussion. There's no reason to edit the Gnomish pages like that, and the Haiku Katana doesn't count as a precedence-- that's still being discussed. --TechSmurf 19:44, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
