User talk:MadonKody

Fancy Bottles of Beer‎

You created a ZAP group with all bottles of fancy beer in it – rare and common ones alike – which surprised me a little. Did you and some clannies/friends test all these or were you just assuming they all zap into each other because two of the beers do? (Since you asked: Format wise, everything seems to be in order with your template.) --Yatsufusa (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Messed up the analyses. Thought had enough of the data point to say the "Artisanal homebrew only" and "Let's Brew" zapped into each other. However had made errors during tabulation of reports. Swapped types of Race Car Red and Rapier Witbier then double enter them a 2nd time correctly typing them, additionally miss-check of a pair that the data set did not have. That faulty tabulation looked "almost" complete, it was wrong.

At present the data set is 6 pairs, one for each possible transitions within the 2 sets of 3. Thus it is consistent with and complete for 2 set of 3. Have not observed nor have received a reported pairs that in reality cross the two types when they are identified correctly. --MadonKody (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• So, the beers you can only get from the crate are 1 group, and the beers you can get from the shop are another group? — Cool12309 (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes.

They looks to be.

A) Artisanal homebrew sampler only set [ Race Car Red or Greedy Dog or Lambada Lambic ] they have all zapped into each other

B) Let's Brew! set [ Old Pugilist, Professor Brew, Rapier Wibier ] they have all zapped into each other.

Am not aware of any zaps that have cross between these two sets. --MadonKody (talk) 02:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• Okay, I've split the template into two separate groups, based on your corrected data: Common and Rare. Feel free to rename them if you find something more fitting. ;) --Yatsufusa (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Badly Romantic Arrow

Hey there--I saw you edited the Frozen Bag of Tortellini page to include the different pre-combat text for arrow'd instances of the monster. That's unnecessary, though; that pre-combat text is identical for every single arrow'd monster that shows up, so it would make no sense to include it on every monster page. We've already got that message on the fire a badly romantic arrow page.

Just thought I'd let you know why I removed your edit. Cheers! --Southwest (talk) 16:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Apologizes. Did not see your message and thought has messed up the edit. Was so not attempting and edit war, thus the re-add and may even have undo your undo, when I understood my error.--MadonKody (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)