Talk:BRICKO brick

used 2 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together, and add an eye brick. You acquire an item: BRICKO ooze

used 3 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together, making a rather bumpy hat. You acquire an item: BRICKO hat

used 5 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together, and add an eye brick. You acquire an item: BRICKO bat

used 6 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together into a really sturdy sword. You acquire an item: BRICKO sword

used 8 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together, and add an eye brick. You acquire an item: BRICKO oyster

used 9 bricks: You fit the BRICKO blocks together, creating some interesting pants. You acquire an item: BRICKO pants

tried 11: You think you could make something intersting with 11 BRICKOs, if you had an eye brick.

tried 23: You think you could make something intersting with 23 BRICKOs, if you had an eye brick.

tried 37: You think you could make something intersting with 37 BRICKOs, if you had an eye brick.

ran out at 63 bricks, don't have torso awaregness. --Boozeogre 04:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

According to Volo it takes 69 bricks to make a Black Snake--Emperor Norton II 05:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The bricko monsters that you create with the bricks seem to have a similar mechanic to the infernal seals,or at least you don't spend a adventure on fighting them.

Not sure however if there's a cap on how many you can fight in one day,as i could not summon any more eyes.

I'd be willing to bet that there'll be a BRICKO Pyramid in this content somewhere... --Zan 08:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

• The pyramid is 420 bricks, yes, four-hundred twenty. --RoyalTonberry 08:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Using 1100 (and an eye brick in inventory) of these creates a BRICKO vacuum cleaner --Mr Purple 12:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The bricko chicken image has 309blocks per leg and two legs. So 618 makes a chicken? --Plater (t|c) 14:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

• I cannot count to save my life. Left Leg: 146, Right Leg: 185 For a total of 331? ImageCount--Plater (t|c) 15:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Given that all the numbers seem significant in some way, is there anything for 666, or for 1337?--Parse 17:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

• Who's willing to bet 2300 (of some mix) and 3700 (of some mix) are also significant? --RoyalTonberry 21:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • What about other numbers that appear in the game? 977, 7224, and 69,105, to name a few. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 22:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

There is no item 4484, but there is 4483 and 4485. I think something is there. Starguy 00:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

• I'd say 4484 is the last monster, the Giant Chicken, since that is at the end of the group of monsters. 4495 is probably the familiar hatchling, an egg, that the chicken drops (since that is right before the familiar's equip). 4490 is in the middle of the different monster drops, so it might be a second drop from the chicken (not a combat item) or another undiscovered drop.--Jeffbee 20:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

When you use one of the monster items, is it used up? Or would that fight just take a turn? --Jimfromtx 06:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

• Usually, unless otherwise specified, all items are used up after you use it. Likewise, unless otherwise specified, all combats take a turn. --CG1:t,c,e 06:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Then someone should make a note of it. The text buttons don't have a (1) next to them, and they do NOT take a turn. (Try answering the question next time instead of talking about generics.)--Terrabull 19:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Haven't seen this noted anywhere, but I was able to putty the bat. presumably the other monsters can be puttied as well - leechboy

I was able to find a brickoegg image, so I'm guessing this is one of the missing recipes, and the hatchling for the familiar.--Foggy 15:15, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

• The egg probably drops from the giant chicken.--Jeffbee 20:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

May I make a suggestion to collapse the main page into an easier-to-read table please? --Urutsini 13:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

• I agree, but I cannot find a table that works for it to copy. I checked palm fronds and they're listed in the same way as the brickos. --Plater (t|c) 13:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
  • yeah, that's the way we roll at the minute. i quite like it, although i agree this "joke taken way too far" is a little unwieldy. would a summary table somewhere else be ok? or, perhaps, a new kind of table not dissimilar to the ones we have like {{Candy Hearts}}? --Evilkolbot 14:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
    • I like the Candy Heart style table idea. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 19:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Sadly, trying to use 11000 or 13000 BRICKO bricks doesn't make anything interesting. --GoldS 00:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Ditto 23000. --GoldS 02:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

What numbers have you tried? I'm sure you are capable of testing all consecutive numbers up to 23,000, but have you? --Club (#66669) (Talk) 03:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I could, but no, I haven't.--GoldS 04:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, I've personally tried all numbers up to 1350 so far, with no new creations. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 23:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

It seems highly unlikely, but one of Monster Manuel's messages for the BRICKO airship says, "The world's record for most BRICKO blocks used in a single construction is 1,524,876." Anyone up for trying to multi-use 1524876 BRICKO bricks? --Baltar (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Eye bricks

I seem to only be able to summon three eye bricks per day, anyone else?--Terrabull 19:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

• Already discussed at Talk:Summon BRICKOs and Talk:BRICKO eye brick. Three's the limit. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 20:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Conditionals?

So, the page states that the drops are conditional. In what way are they conditional? The Conditional drop page does not list any BRICKO-mechanism and it could thus be good with an explanation I feel. Winterbay 08:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

• The only reason we know it's conditional is because the He-Boulder firing a yellow ray does not guarantee that the item drops. We don't know the exact mechanics behind this conditionality, although it's possible it may simply be a trivial conditionality. --CG1:t,c,e 08:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Thank you for that clarification. I had missed that tehre was a type called "trivial conditionality", which otherwise would've been a good guess yes :) Seeing as I just got out of BM I didn't want to miss anything due to misunderstanding something... Winterbay 12:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

• I'd like to point out that the number range of items seems off as well. After killing an octopus I only got 1 black brick and a few other brickos. The range in the article says 3-5--Alfredo Boyardee 17:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
  • It says 3-7 BRICKO bricks, black BRICKO brick. A single black brick is already the highest number you can get from a fight with this monster. --Yatsufusa 17:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Rationale of inconsistency?

Has there ever been a justification (either game-logic or meta) of the copyability distinction between the bat and ooze and the other monsters? --Kay Dekker 21:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I would imagine it is because the ones that are copyable drop only regular bricks. The ones that drop special bricks are not-copyable. Somewhat odd that the regular brick ones are copyable, but then again they're not really worth copying compared to the ones you cannot copy. --Lordebon 22:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The in-game reasoning is exactly the reasoning/message given when you attempt to use the copying item on them and it fails. The meta reason is for balance. Otherwise people would figure out what the most powerful bricko monster they could pull in-run is and do that for a lot of stat gains with no adventure cost (just the pull, but since pixel orbs tend to be worth a pull, so too would a 10k ML critter). --Flargen 22:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Mistaken Reference

I think the corporate branding defense reference is mistaken, and that the text is just a reference to the "they're LEGO Bricks or Toys, not just LEGOs" thing. I've added the latter, and want to propose removing the former. Anyone want to speak up for or against it? --Stik guy1 (talk) 22:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)