Talk:Negative Status Attacks: Difference between revisions
From A KoL Wiki
imported>Club propose hot tub test |
imported>Coolguy00001 eh? |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*On the [[A Relaxing Hot Tub|hot tub]] page there is a note citing Jick that it removes all "negative status effects". So any effect from an attack that the tub doesn't remove, isn't a negative status effect. I'm not sure about teleportitis, but [[Fearless]] doesn't look like one to me. --{{User:Club/sig}} 21:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | *On the [[A Relaxing Hot Tub|hot tub]] page there is a note citing Jick that it removes all "negative status effects". So any effect from an attack that the tub doesn't remove, isn't a negative status effect. I'm not sure about teleportitis, but [[Fearless]] doesn't look like one to me. --{{User:Club/sig}} 21:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Status Attacks== | |||
I think that we should instead move this page to another page called "Status Attacks" and then split the page into two sections denoting "Negative" and "Positive". [[Mad at Science]], for example is probably a positive effect, despite being on this page. --{{User:Coolguy00001/sig}} 22:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:39, 31 August 2009
Teleportitis?
I think it would have to count as a Negative Status Attack; after all, What's that Smell is included, which is a positive buff, and teleportitis can easily send you into danger if the zone is too high, or say, it sends you to the sea to accidentally fight a trophyfish. Argus 19:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- On the hot tub page there is a note citing Jick that it removes all "negative status effects". So any effect from an attack that the tub doesn't remove, isn't a negative status effect. I'm not sure about teleportitis, but Fearless doesn't look like one to me. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 21:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Status Attacks
I think that we should instead move this page to another page called "Status Attacks" and then split the page into two sections denoting "Negative" and "Positive". Mad at Science, for example is probably a positive effect, despite being on this page. --CG1:t,c,e 22:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)