Talk:Sword behind inappropriate prepositions: Difference between revisions

From A KoL Wiki
imported>Club
imported>Phlip
Line 7: Line 7:


These are the prepositions I've found so far. Should these be added to the item page?
These are the prepositions I've found so far. Should these be added to the item page?
*about
*above
*across
*across
*after
*after
Line 22: Line 24:
*beyond
*beyond
*by
*by
*down
*during
*during
*except
*except
Line 39: Line 42:
*over
*over
*past
*past
*through
*throughout
*throughout
*to
*under
*under
*up
*up
Line 49: Line 54:


* This looks like a job for <nowiki><RandomlySelect></nowiki> (for now, in {{tl|Test/preposition}}) - "If you want {{Test/preposition}} rise {{Test/preposition}} the masses {{Test/preposition}} the field {{Test/preposition}} combat, then this is the sword you should have {{Test/preposition}} your hand or strapped {{Test/preposition}} your belt. Its temper and sharpness are head and shoulders {{Test/preposition}} the rest. One two, one two, and {{Test/preposition}} and {{Test/preposition}} -- {{Test/preposition}} this sword {{Test/preposition}} your side, it won't be long {{Test/preposition}} victory is {{Test/preposition}} your reach." --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 09:03, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
* This looks like a job for <nowiki><RandomlySelect></nowiki> (for now, in {{tl|Test/preposition}}) - "If you want {{Test/preposition}} rise {{Test/preposition}} the masses {{Test/preposition}} the field {{Test/preposition}} combat, then this is the sword you should have {{Test/preposition}} your hand or strapped {{Test/preposition}} your belt. Its temper and sharpness are head and shoulders {{Test/preposition}} the rest. One two, one two, and {{Test/preposition}} and {{Test/preposition}} -- {{Test/preposition}} this sword {{Test/preposition}} your side, it won't be long {{Test/preposition}} victory is {{Test/preposition}} your reach." --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 09:03, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
**I added a couple more to the list, I think that's the lot. [[User:Phlip|Phlip]] 14:10, 17 August 2006 (CDT)


== Obscure Reference? ==
== Obscure Reference? ==

Revision as of 19:10, 17 August 2006

  • should that not, rather than "on", be "by your side," or is that inappropriateness apposite? --Evilkolbot 01:45, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
    • It looks like it should be, so I fixed it.--Piroteknix 02:05, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
      • "at your side" would also be correct, but we'll probably never know what it was 'supposed' to be. --Quietust 09:05, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
  • at, by, and on are options in the list below. if the preposition is always inappropriate that would be one way of working it out. --Evilkolbot 10:15, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Possible prepositions

These are the prepositions I've found so far. Should these be added to the item page?

  • about
  • above
  • across
  • after
  • against
  • along
  • among
  • around
  • at
  • before
  • behind
  • below
  • beneath
  • beside
  • between
  • beyond
  • by
  • down
  • during
  • except
  • for
  • from
  • in
  • inside
  • into
  • like
  • near
  • of
  • off
  • on
  • onto
  • out
  • outside
  • over
  • past
  • through
  • throughout
  • to
  • under
  • up
  • upon
  • with
  • within
  • without

--Piroteknix 02:07, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Obscure Reference?

Probably too obscure, but it does seem so similar. The mathematical poetry group Oulipo has a poetic method called N+7. For a given existing text, and a given dictionary, replace every noun with a noun seven words down in the dictionary. Example:

Using The Living Language Common Usage Dictionary: English-Russian, the opening of the book of Genesis becomes:
In the bend God created the hen and the education. And the education was without founder, and void; and death was upon the falsehood of the demand. And the sport of God moved upon the falsehood of the wealth. And God said, Let there be limit; and there was limit.

source for example

--Club 13:38, 16 August 2006 (CDT)