Talk:Sack lunch

I used summon sack lunch on my one account (account A), immediately logged on to my other account (account B) and did summon sack lunch, and it said that account A stole my lunch. --Lemon-claw 23:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

My wiki skills are sharply limited, but here's something at least. As for the food items, I've gotten a gnatloaf casserole. --Akatosh 13:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Add another gnatloaf casserole received to the list. Someone on the forums mentioned getting a fishy fish casserole maybe it creates cassaroles? --RebusSohal 14:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

• Day 2: long pork casserole. Probably should mention I am a level 17 SC just in case level means anything.--RebusSohal 03:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
• Day 3: fishy fish casserole.--RebusSohal 13:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Long pork casserole has also been observed, completing the set. Also I'm curious what it would do if a lower level player used it.--ManaUser 18:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I got a ravioli della hippy, so it's not just casseroles. --Foggy 14:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hoping the quantum taco will occasionally be produced. --Lxndr 15:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

That would be deliciously, deliciously meta. --Akatosh 21:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Just got a cherry pie. Level 15 DB multi. --Monod 07:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Painful penne pasta, level 8 sauceror--Foggy 17:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Ravioli della hippy, level 8 DB, HC bad moon run--Uebergeek 22:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Cherry pie, level 11 SC --Fhthd 08:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Two fishy fish casseroles the last two days, as level 21-22 DB. Think the quality of the food scales to your level? Has anybody at a high level gotten really crappy food or vice versa? --Akatosh 13:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

• fishy fish casserole (after nightcap, if that matters). Level 29 AT. Will repost if something different/better/new -- HickDead 15:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

• 2 cherry pies the past two uses. One at level 29, and today at level 30 (yay!) - HickDead 07:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

My multi's a level 7 DB and just got carob chunk noodles. Delicious... --Ackyri 16:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

long pork casserloe, Level 12 Pastamancer. --GoddessOfHair 15:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

2 long pork casseroles, level 12 disco bandit--Christine444 04:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't have any new items to add, but I find it somewhat interesting that every food item seen so far is 3 Fullness, that part might be guaranteed.--Cait 14:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I got a chorizo taco. --Quacko4 18:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Trollhouse cookies as a level 3 Turtle Tamer --Vladmyr 20:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

This is a wild theory--we probably would've noticed it by now--but could the food actually be taken from the player named in the Lunch Break casting? ---Ackyri 01:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

• That would certainly make sense, seeing as this Crimbo is playing more on inter-player actions. Butts, Covert Crimbo buddies, the fax machines, I think that makes quite a bit of sense. The trick is going to be nailing it. Would it be foods on their eaten list? Foods they ate today? Food in their inventory?--Fluxxdog 02:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • While I don't no for a fact this isn't the case and I don't necessarily want to discourage spading, you will notice it doesn't say you took the person named in the casting's lunch. It says they took your lunch and thus you are going to steal SOMEBODY ELSE'S lunch. Also, actually taking it out of their inventory would be bogus, and just cloning something that happens to be in their inventory seems... odd. --Ohnoanotherputz 07:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
    • I doubt they'd implement a skill that'd let you just swipe someone's food directly from their inventory. But what I was thinking was that they were using that player to determine what you got. If they're using another player, it's gonna be a bit of a stretch getting people connected. It's like Connect the Dots in the dark.--Fluxxdog 09:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
• I'd very much doubt that they're basing on what's in someone's inventory because of the lag-inducing load it would have compared to a randomly generated item. Besides, a theory like that really isn't held out by the foods we've seen, which are all cooked. If it was picking random foods from people, it'd biased towards junk that drops like White Chocolate Chips, Cottage Cheese and Dessicated Apricots, It's definitely not going to be the last caster since the text is the wrong way around, and if it was speedsters would all have a multi with just this skill and only Bounty Os or Pumpkin Pies or something in their inventory. My guess is that it's selected from a sublist of things, filtered for those are of a high enough level to consume. I'd recommend starting a thread on kolspading.com for more visibility. --Hippoking 14:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
  • The cooked theory was good until someone put up Trollhouse cookies which are drop only, not cooked, just like the ghuol guolash mentioned below. :/ One thing I've noticed is none of the foods are crappy or EPIC, and adjusting Cait's observation above, none of the foods are more than 3 fullness so far.--Fluxxdog 03:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

As level 4 I got a ghuol guolash. --Jubbo 16:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Natnit/RTB/BCC set up a spreadsheet to collect this data. Upload your results here: http://tinyurl.com/39djfdn --Hippoking 19:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

(That link wasn't working for me, so I changed the url to the one RT left in the forums) --Starwed 20:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

That link also wasn't working, so I've replaced it with a tinyurl that seems to. --Hippoking 11:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

• I didn't record the exact dates so I'm reluctant to add to the spreadsheet, but I've been at level 1 for the past twelve days and I have 3 ghuol guolashes, 2 Spam Witch sammiches, 4 t8r tots and 3 Trollhouse cookies. It looks to me like there are different groups of foods for levels 1-4, 5-7, 8-10 and 11+. --Monod 07:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Just add them to the spreadsheet with a ? for the date. I'd agree with your assessment at this point, although we don't have any data for L5 so the ranges could be off. --Starwed 22:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)